Testing prompted by an Associated Press story that revealed trace amounts of
pharmaceuticals in drinking
water supplies has shown that more Americans are affected by the problem
than previously thought at least 46 million.
That's up from 41 million people reported by the AP in March as part of an
investigation into the presence of pharmaceuticals in the nation's
waterways.
The AP stories prompted federal and local legislative hearings, brought about
calls for mandatory testing and disclosure, and led officials in at least 27
additional metropolitan areas to analyze their drinking water. Positive tests
were reported in 17 cases, including Reno, Nev., Savannah, Ga., Colorado Springs, Colo., and Huntsville, Ala. Results
are pending in three others.
The test results, added to data from communities and water utilities that
bowed to pressure to disclose earlier test results, produce the new total of
Americans known to be exposed to drug-contaminated drinking water supplies.
The overwhelming majority of U.S. cities have not tested drinking water while
eight cities including Boston, Phoenix and Seattle were relieved that tests showed no
detections.
"We didn't think we'd find anything because our water comes from a pristine
source, but after the AP stories we wanted to make sure and reassure our
customers," said Andy Ryan, spokesman for Seattle Public
Utilities.
The substances detected in the latest tests mirrored those cited in the
earlier AP report.
Chicago, for example, found a cholesterol medication and a nicotine
derivative. Many cities found the anti-convulsant carbamazepine. Officials in
one of those communities, Colorado Springs, say they detected five
pharmaceuticals in all, including a tranquilizer and a hormone.
"This is obviously an emerging issue and after the AP stories came out we
felt it was the responsible thing for us to do, as a utility, to find out where
we stand. We believe that at these levels, based on current science, that the
water is completely safe for our customers," said Colorado Springs spokesman Steve Berry. "We don't want
to create unnecessary alarm, but at the same time we have a responsibility as a
municipal utility to communicate with our customers and let them know."
Fargo's water director, Bruce Grubb, said the concentrations of three drugs
detected there were so incredibly minute parts per trillion that he sent
them to the local health officer to figure out how to interpret the information
for the community.
"We plan to put this into some kind of context other than just scientific
nomenclature, so folks can get some level of understanding about what it means,"
said Grubb.
The drug residues detected in water supplies are generally flushed into
sewers and waterways through human excretion. Many of the pharmaceuticals are
known to slip through sewage and drinking water treatment plants.
While the comprehensive risks are still unclear, researchers are finding
evidence that even extremely diluted concentrations of pharmaceutical residues
harm fish, frogs and other aquatic species in the wild and impair the workings
of human cells in the laboratory.
And while the new survey expands the known extent of the problem, the
overwhelming majority of U.S. communities have yet to test, including the single
largest water provider in the country, New
York City's Department of Environmental Protection, which delivers water
to 9 million people.
In April, New York City council members insisted during an emergency hearing
that their drinking water be tested. But DEP officials subsequently declared
that "the testing of finished tap water is not warranted at this time."